Chargebacks & Disputes · Use case
Analyse dispute root causes
Short answer
Most disputes come from a small set of causes: confusing descriptors, unclear subscriptions, delivery problems or fraud. Analytics that cluster disputes by reason, product, descriptor and issuer show which fixes remove the most disputes.
What this use case is
Most disputes come from a small set of causes: confusing descriptors, unclear subscriptions, delivery problems or fraud. Analytics that cluster disputes by reason, product, descriptor and issuer show which fixes remove the most disputes.
Who builds this
What your customer sees
- 1Clearer descriptors, receipts and subscription communication
How Chargebacks & Disputes solves it
Dispute and transaction data consolidated
Dispute and transaction data consolidated
Grouped by reason code, product, descriptor, issuer
Grouped by reason code, product, descriptor, issuer
Trends and outliers identified
Trends and outliers identified
Fixes prioritised
Fixes prioritised
Impact tracked over time
Impact tracked over time
Want to have
- Data from all PSPs
- Reason-code mapping across schemes
- Segmentation
- Trend reporting
- Exports
Optional
- Recommendations
Design decisions
Tooling
speed versus flexibility.
What to put in your RFP
Data sources
- Data sources
Segmentation
- Segmentation
Reporting
- Reporting
Exports
- Exports
Pricing
- Pricing
How to evaluate providers for this use case
- 1Data consolidation across PSPs
- 2Segmentation depth
- 3Usability
Pitfalls
- Analysing one PSP's data only
- Insights nobody owns acting on
What providers will ask you
- PSPs and data access
- Dispute volumes
- Owners for fixes
Other Finlane categories that cover parts of this
This use case is solved mainly with Chargebacks & Disputes. These categories cover specific parts of it and can be tendered alongside it.